Background and objective: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of routine postnatal clinical examination and pulse oximetry screening in detecting congenital heart disease in newborns. The aim of this study is to determine whether a pulse oximetry screening combined with clinical examination is superior in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease to clinical examination alone.
Methods: 1000 term newborn babies born in tertiary Hospital during the study period of 18 months ( Feb 2017 to May 2018 ) had a thorough clinical examination on day 2 of life with emphasis on peripheral pulses, cyanosis, tachypnea, cardiac pulsations and murmurs. Pulse oximetry screening was done within 4hrs of birth and at 48-72hrs of life. Echocardiogram was done for those babies with either abnormal clinical examination or pulse oximetry reading. Clinical examination was done again 2 weeks after discharge.
Results: The sensitivity of combined screening was 95.65%, whereas it was 26% for oximetry alone and 60% for clinical examination alone. Specificity for combined screening was 99.89%, 99.8% for pulse oximetry alone, 98% for clinical examination alone. The positive predictive value of the combined tool was 95.65%.
Conclusion: Combining pulse oximetry and clinical examination can enhance the clinician’s ability to detect life threatening CHD in a timely manner.
Role of clinical examination and pulse oximetry in screening for congenital heart disease in newborns
Page:
4623-4627
Download PDF:
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.24327/23956429.ijcmpr201910758
Select Volume: